I have to be honest, though, while Pres. Obama adopted the meat of McCain’s proposal, he sure made it less inclusive and more regressive. Being some DINO Mr Obama proves to us once again.

John McCain proposed 00 tax credit to EVERYONE for purchasing health care.
If you are wealthy and in the 38% tax bracket that would give you 00/38% = 94 worth of health care free to everyone.
If you are middle class and in the 25% tax bracket that would give you 00/25% = ,000 worth of health care free to everyone.
See? Wealthy people would enjoy less tax exemptions. That’s progressive.

Now goes Mr. Obama actual proposal to put a cap on health care tax deductions. Needless to say that people who by health care insurance privately do not need to apply. This is how Obama encourages small businesses in their mission of jobs creation. But lets forget about such small irrelevant things.

There is now 100% tax detectability of health care group policy provided by employers. Obama wants to put 00 cap on this tax deductible benefits. Meaning that compared to McCain’s plan wealthy people whose tax deduction would be only 94 anyway under McCain will get no tax hit, but those in the middle class will be liable for the difference ,000 – ,000 = ,000 to lose its tax deductible and hence pay ,000 x 25% = ,000 extra tax.

So much for taxing the rich.
Ref:

http://taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org/blog/_archives/2009/2/26/4105759.html

There are more and I admit that some of my input data are not accurate, but its only because

a) The liberal media ignores the misdeeds of Barack Obama
b) The plans are still in the making – and this is the best point to stop them.
Ref:

http://taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org/blog/_archives/2009/2/26/4105759.html

There are more and I admit that some of my input data are not accurate, but its only because

a) The liberal media ignores the misdeeds of Barack Obama
b) The plans are still in the making – and this is the best point to stop them.

Premise of company: To provide opportunity of professional representation for musicians, irregardless of financial status, primarily targetting low-budget talent.

Consideration for NPO: Would the extra startup work and iability to gain profit be worth the added benefits provided to the appropriate NPO, such as tax exemptions/deductions, encourage support from organizations that would otherwise be competition, attract promotional/charitable attention, greater potential for grant/loan funding.

Reasons for considering profit-based Corp: easier initial startup and maintenance, less red tape and politics in regards to spending/promoting/expanding, ability to develope into large-scale profitable business.

I am interested in any constructive input. I have done quite a bit of research into the formation process for NPO, but not Corp status. Also, I’d be interested in hearing pros and cons for Inc, Uninc, or LLC status if you advocate that route. Thank you.